We couldn't help but notice that June 7 is the 54th
anniversary of the premiere of the television game show, The $64,000 Question.
The show, whose name and top prize now seem almost quaint, was simple to
play. A contestant would answer a series of questions on a topic of their choosing. Prizes started at $1,
and doubled with each correct answer. If the contestant got seventeen in a
row correct, they’d go home with, yes, $64,000 (more than $500,000 in 2009
dollars). The program was wildly popular, and many of the contestants became
nationally famous (perhaps none moreso than psychologist Dr. Joyce Brothers,
who won the top prize for her knowledge of boxing,
of all things.) But Question was one of only dozens of game shows and quiz programs that populated America’s TV screens in
the 1950s.
In spite of their success, Question and almost all of the
others were off the air by 1959. What happened? In a word: cheating.
While most of the shows were legitimate, there were a few -- most notably Twenty-One and Dotto -- that were rigged.
Producers had come to the conclusion that not only did audiences want to see
familiar faces playing their games, they also wanted to see those players
win. So, producers being what they are, they decided to slip the players the answers to the questions while instructing them to pretend to
struggle while answering.
The most notorious of those cheating contestants
was Charles Van Doren, who had no reason to cheat. The son of a poet and a novelist,
he had degrees in astrophysics
and English, as well as being himself an instructor at Columbia University,
and was more than capable of coming up with legitimate answers.
While Van Doren denied the allegations of cheating at first, he finally admitted his culpability
when called before a Congressional subcommittee investigating the scandal.
While his own reputation never really recovered, game shows eventually made a comeback, though they would
never again be as popular as they had once been and were now policed and
regulated to the point of squeaky-cleanness.
(My own experience on Jeopardy! was an example of that; we weren't allowed to speak
to host Alex Trebek, and contestants were chosen for a particular game just
moments ahead of taping-time, so there would be no chance to prepare or
collude.)
That policing has guaranteed that contests on television nowadays are above
reproach and that nothing untoward could possibly affect their integrity. Right?
Suggested Sites...
|
No comments:
Post a Comment