Warning: Old Fart Alert ahead.
Do people have any kind of cultural memories
anymore? I mean, anything that’s more than fifteen minutes old?
I know that the average Joe doesn’t. I’ve long
since given up on that since the day – some ten years ago – when, in directing
an actor (of my own age, mind you; not some kid who was wet behind the ears), I
asked him to play it more like Ralph Kramden. He looked at me with the blankest
of stares. Whenever I’m in New York, and walk down Eighth Avenue past Port
Authority, I see the statue of Mr. Kramden that was erected
as a publicity stunt for Nick at Nite in 2000. I pass it and I wonder how many
of the thousands who pass by it every day have even the slightest clue who he (or
even Jackie Gleason) is – or if they even notice it.
I’ll grant you that the last episode of “The
Honeymooners” aired nearly 60 years ago, but does that mean that such a
cultural landmark has to be wiped from our collective memory?
Or take the case just a couple of years ago when I
directed another actor (again, roughly my age) to play something more like the
character of Hank Kimball, the bumbling county agent on “Green Acres.” Hank was
constantly contradicting himself, rephrasing
things, and making a muddle of the simplest thoughts – exactly what the
character was going through in the play we were doing. Again, I was met with a
blank stare. In this case, it was a little more understandable. “Green
Acres” had been off the air for quite a while then, and wasn’t being commonly
rerun (unlike now). But, still, it was something the actor and I had grown up
with.
What sparks this rant is two reviews. The first is
of last night’s finale of “True Detective.” The first, on Slate (which, I’ll
admit, features some of the dimmest critics of television and movies on the
Internet) talked about one character suddenly adopting an English accent for no
apparent reason – to the critics, at least. To anyone who’s seen any reasonable
number of classic movies realized immediately, this character had Alfred
Hitchcock’s “North by Northwest” playing in the background, and the audience
was treated not only to the scene where Cary Grant is abducted but where James
Mason’s character berates Grant’s character for not owning up to what he thinks
is his true identity. (This isn’t the clip in question, but will give you a taste of the suavity
that the “True Detective” character is emulating.)
Now, again, I don’t necessarily expect everyone –
and certainly not, well, kids – to be intimately familiar with one of the
finest movies directed by one of the greatest film directors. That would be too
much to hope for. But what I would expect is that someone who is being
paid – and, one assumes, paid handsomely – to analyze, critique, and rate
television shows and movies be at least a little literate with the basic “great
films.”
I would be wrong, apparently.
And then, last night, reading a review of the
latest episode of “How I Met Your Mother” (a show that has long since jumped
the shark, but which I’m still watching only because it’s so close to the end –
and, after reading some of the recent speculation, I want to see if they indeed
bump off the eponymous mother in the final episode). One of the characters
(“The Captain,” played by the why-is-he-slumming-in-this? Kyle
MacLachlan) starts his day by greeting his staff with a musical number.
Reviewer Donna Bowman of TV Club identifies it thusly: “How delightful is the
Captain’s morning song to his housekeeping staff, which I presume is modeled
on The Sound of Music a reader informs me is from H.M.S. Pinafore?”
Now,
for the third time (at least), I’m not expecting young people who aren’t ardent
fans of either Gilbert and Sullivan (or Aaron Sorkin) to know “Pinafore,” but I
would hope that anyone in Ms. Butler’s position of interpreting and explaining
television shows ranging from HIMYM to “Breaking Bad” (a show that was, of
course, free of any references to anything else) would have a basic knowledge
of pop culture that didn’t stop with the videos she watched as a child.
I’m
reminded of an online argument I got into a few years ago. I’d just watched a
short on TCM that featured a musical act of three guys parodying popular
culture. Their references included mentioning plays by Eugene O’Neill, George
Bernard Shaw, and Henrik Ibsen. I mentioned that you’d be hard-pressed to do
such an act today and unwittingly caused a storm of heated comment.
I
didn’t think it was just that the theatre has completely dropped out of
cultural awareness – as much as I love it and breathe it, I know it’s a niche –
but that who, other than theatre majors or all but a fringe knows O’Neill,
Shaw, or Ibsen at all – or even any modern playwright? People might know David Mamet or Tracy Letts
(and him only because of the film of
“August: Osage County”), but mention anyone other than Shakespeare – and I have
my doubts about even him – and I’m
afraid you’re going to get the blank look I got when I mentioned Ralph Kramden
and Hank Kimball.
Now,
let me hasten to add, TV Club can do a pretty good job of bringing cultural
history to the awareness of their readers. (I mean, right now, they have a front-page feature on “He and She,” a
wonderful sitcom that ran one season in 1967. And their appreciation of “Green Acres” is
well-done.) But I’d hope that any critic, for any major site or publication,
would be aware of popular culture that pre-dates their own birth.
Even today, I was listening to a podcast of Marc Maron interviewing Dick Van Dyke. Obviously, to hear his introduction to the interview -- and in the talk itself -- Maron has great respect for Van Dyke, but it was obvious that not only did he not really get any of the references Van Dyke was making, but he hadn't done even any basic research, like looking up his home town or credits; that he was working off having seen "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" forty years ago and "Mary Poppins" and "The Dick Van Dyke Show" at some indeterminate times in the past. He was so unprepared, he made Larry King look like Robert Caro. I can defend not knowing every aspect of the man's career or all of his references, but would it have killed him to take two minutes to look at his IMDb page and get the basics?
Even today, I was listening to a podcast of Marc Maron interviewing Dick Van Dyke. Obviously, to hear his introduction to the interview -- and in the talk itself -- Maron has great respect for Van Dyke, but it was obvious that not only did he not really get any of the references Van Dyke was making, but he hadn't done even any basic research, like looking up his home town or credits; that he was working off having seen "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" forty years ago and "Mary Poppins" and "The Dick Van Dyke Show" at some indeterminate times in the past. He was so unprepared, he made Larry King look like Robert Caro. I can defend not knowing every aspect of the man's career or all of his references, but would it have killed him to take two minutes to look at his IMDb page and get the basics?
So,
yes. I’m old.
And I’m cranky.
But
I know who both Gus Visser and Pharrell Williams are.
So
there.
No comments:
Post a Comment